DAVID G. KIRSCHEN, OD, PHD
Optometry at Brea Blvd, Brea, CA
License number
California OP5418T
Category
Optometry
Type
Pediatrics
Address
Address
428 S Brea Blvd, Brea, CA 92821
Phone
(714) 529-2470
Organization information
See more information about DAVID G. KIRSCHEN at bizstanding.comDAVID G. KIRSCHEN, OD, PHD, A PROFESSIONAL OPTOMETRIC CORPORATION
428 S Brea Blvd, Brea, CA 92821
Doing business as:
David G. Kirschen, OD, PH.D., A Professional Optometric Corporation
Registration:
Nov 15, 2004
State ID:
C2683033
Business type:
Articles of Incorporation
President:
David Kirschen (President)
Agent:
David Gary Kirschen,Brea, CA 92821 (Physical)
Professional information
Dr. David G Kirschen, Brea CA - PHD
Specialties:
Pediatric Optometry
Address:
428 S Brea Blvd, Brea 92821
(714) 529-2470 (Phone)
(714) 529-2470 (Phone)
Languages:
English
Hospitals:
428 S Brea Blvd, Brea 92821
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
757 Westwood Plz, Los Angeles 90095
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
757 Westwood Plz, Los Angeles 90095
David Gary Kirschen, Brea CA
Specialties:
Optometrist
Address:
428 S Brea Blvd, Brea, CA 92821
Adaptive Visual Performance Testing System
US Patent:
2013033, Dec 19, 2013
Filed:
Aug 19, 2013
Appl. No.:
13/969732
Inventors:
David Gary Kirschen - Brea CA, US
Daniel Moses Laby - Canton MA, US
Daniel Moses Laby - Canton MA, US
Assignee:
EYEcheck Systems, LLC - Brea CA
Alcon Research, Ltd. - Fort Worth TX
Alcon Research, Ltd. - Fort Worth TX
International Classification:
A61B 3/02
US Classification:
351239
Abstract:
A method of testing visual performance includes determining a difficulty rating for each of a plurality of visual recognition tests. The method further includes displaying one of the visual recognition tests to a subject and receiving from the subject a response to the visual recognition test. After receiving the response to the visual recognition test, a subsequent visual recognition test is selected to have a difficulty rating determined based on the response received from the subject, the subsequent visual recognition test is displayed, and a response is received from the subject. The subsequent visual recognition tests are repeated until a predetermined number of responses is reached. A visual performance score is determined based on the set of responses received from the subject and the difficulty ratings for the visual recognition tests displayed to the subject is then output.
Methods And Systems For Intelligent Visual Function Assessments
US Patent:
2012007, Mar 29, 2012
Filed:
Dec 1, 2011
Appl. No.:
13/308951
Inventors:
David Gary Kirschen - Brea CA, US
Daniel Moses Laby - Canton MA, US
Daniel Moses Laby - Canton MA, US
International Classification:
A61B 3/02
US Classification:
351239, 351246
Abstract:
A system and method of testing vision performance includes displaying a visual recognition test to a subject and receiving from the subject a response to the visual recognition test. After receiving the response to the visual recognition test, a subsequent visual recognition test is selected based on the response received from the subject, the subsequent visual recognition test is displayed, and a response is received from the subject. The subsequent visual recognition tests are repeated until a predetermined criterion is reached. A vision performance score is determined based on the visual recognition tests displayed and the set of responses received from the subject and output from the system.
Adaptive Visual Performance Testing System
US Patent:
8534839, Sep 17, 2013
Filed:
Feb 24, 2011
Appl. No.:
13/033930
Inventors:
Patricia Ann Meuse - Mansfield TX, US
Jenny Novotny Devenport - Belmont CA, US
David Gary Kirschen - Brea CA, US
Daniel Moses Laby - Canton MA, US
Jenny Novotny Devenport - Belmont CA, US
David Gary Kirschen - Brea CA, US
Daniel Moses Laby - Canton MA, US
Assignee:
Alcon Research, Ltd. - Fort Worth TX
International Classification:
A61B 3/00, A61B 3/032
US Classification:
351246, 351239
Abstract:
A method of testing visual performance includes determining a difficulty rating for each of a plurality of visual recognition tests. The method further includes displaying one of the visual recognition tests to a subject and receiving from the subject a response to the visual recognition test. After receiving the response to the visual recognition test, a subsequent visual recognition test is selected to have a difficulty rating determined based on the response received from the subject, the subsequent visual recognition test is displayed, and a response is received from the subject. The subsequent visual recognition tests are repeated until a predetermined number of responses is reached. A visual performance score is determined based on the set of responses received from the subject and the difficulty ratings for the visual recognition tests displayed to the subject is then output.